The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) mission in Senegal worked to support a peaceful resolution to the conflict by bolstering infrastructure and providing jobs. One USAID-funded program, undertaken in partnership with EnterpriseWorks Worldwide in 2001, aimed to modernize Casamance’s cashew-processing industry to strengthen the region’s war-torn economy. While cashew exports can bring in significant revenue, the region lacked the infrastructure to produce high-quality nuts for export. Processed cashews can bring in seven to 10 times the price of raw nuts. Today, 90 percent of the 15,000 metric tons of cashews Senegal produces each year come from Casamance.
Sadly, violence in the Casamance region has welled up again in earnest. The peaceful conclusion that many had hoped for following the peace accord of 2004 failed to materialize, and instead, the Senegalese army and Movement for Democratic Forces of Casamance (MFDC) rebels both maintain a large presence in the region.
The USAID-funded expansion of cashew production in Casamance may be having an unintended, and profoundly negative, consequence, reports IRIN News: Skyrocketing cashew prices are “lining the pockets of armed rebels.” Cashews remain a central feature of this conflict in other ways, as well. Earlier this year, more than a dozen villagers attempting to harvest nuts were rewarded by having their ears cut off with machetes by rebels patrolling the area.
MFDC member Damien Manga disputes claims that rebel groups are financed by revenue from cashew exports. He says that while rebels do sell the nuts, the profits finance living expenses only, not weapons purchases. “We collect cashew nuts to sell like everyone else…Some say [selling] cashews…enables us to buy weapons. This is false…it is only our leaders who buy our weapons.” Instead, Manga places blame for violence around the cashew orchards squarely on the shoulders of the Senegalese military. Senegalese military spokesman Lieutenant Malamine Camare refutes this claim, saying that the army’s mission is “to ensure the safety of people and goods in this region. We never engage in profit-making activities, and we execute our mission by the rules.”
Because certain resources and activities are so frequently linked to conflict – diamonds and oil, for example – the role of agriculture is often ignored. As authors Alec Crawford and Oli Brown argue in a new publication discussed in this New Security Beat post, any resource can be exploited to further conflict. Earlier this year, ECSP hosted the “New Horizons at the Nexus of Conflict, Natural Resources, and Health” event series exploring the interaction between human health, natural resources, and conflict.
Photo: A cashew seller in the Gambia. Courtesy of Flickr user Javier D.
Western Cote d’Ivoire, home to the world’s top cocoa producers, saw the worst fighting of the country’s 2002-2003 civil war. This fall brings the promise of a large and important harvest, and high cocoa prices promise important revenue for the country. The country’s first post-war elections are also scheduled for this fall, though, and many farmers worry that pre-election unrest could imperil the harvest. One merchant said that militiamen in the region, idle following the peace agreement, “are responsible for murders, violence, stealing, and attacks on lorries during the cocoa harvest because they’ve nothing to do.”
Anonymous
This article has not been properly researched, as any conflict and a war economy is far more complex than presented. To insinuate that a specific organization working in economic development with cashews has contribted to or is linked with rebel activity is improper and poor research/journalism.
I agree that a single blog post cannot do justice to the complexities of conflict. However, we take care to link to all of our sources, so you can see where we found our information (largely the UN, USAID, IRIN News). As always, we welcome our readers to contribute more detail on this situation.